I live in surburban Long Island, and that basically means that I am expected to maintain my lawn according to the exacting standards of my meticulous neighbors--a lawn, in other words, that is plush, green, and free of unsightly weeds and crabgrass. And that is no small feat when temperatures on the Island reach 100 degrees in July and August as they are often known to do. When that happens my beautiful grass dies, but ugly weeds and crabgrass seem to thrive. It's almost as though they're mocking me by grown to epic heights, while the grass that I had struggled so hard to establish in June withers away.
Perhaps there's not much we can do about dead lawn patches in the heat of summer (other than keeping the sprinkler on all the time, which is no real solution), but don't pesticides at least off us the opportunity to get back at those ungodly weeds? Pesticides are indeed an easy way to ensure a weed free lawn, but at a huge ecological cost. They leach into our groundwater, kill helpful organisims in the soil, and may be responsible for the astronomical rates of breast cancer in places like Long Island.
So does this mean that we basically have to give up on a weed-free lawn. Not exactly. Ed Thompson, founder of the Molloy College Sustainability Institute, believes that the same results can be achieved without having to poison ourselves. Here's what he has to say:
Of course, there are other viable options as well. A friend of my, Kathy Reba, has been trying for years to convince me to get rid of my lawn entirely. "Why don't you just plant perennials in place of a lawn?" she is always suggesting. While this might be an option in some places, my neighbors in Nassau County might look askew at such a development.
A better option for me--and something I've been working on for the past two years--is to replace my regular lawn with a zoysia lawn, which requires much less water and care. A zoysia lawn also stands up much better than traditional lawns to the punishing heat of summer, and is so dense a turf that no pesticides are usually needed on it.
But more on the zoysia issue later....
Friday, July 15, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Mike's Original Post I’ve been having a debate recently with some of my more purist vegan friends about whether a 100% vegan diet i...
-
More and more people are becoming vegetarian as a result of their belief that animals shouldn’t be mistreated on factory farms, or that ...
-
As the Thanksgiving holiday approaches and millions of Americans prepare to dine on millions of turkeys, I sat down to write a blog post a...
-
" Homo Consumens is the man whose main goal is not primarily to own things, but to consume more and more, and thus to compensate for ...
-
One of the things that we try to promote on this site is the adoption of voluntary simplicity as a way of life. Our goal is not to try...
-
Ecologist Richard Conniff has written an interesting opinion piece addressing the question of whether animals are only important becaus...
-
When I drive through upstate New York, I’m always in awe of the natural beauty of the state of which I am proud to call myself a citizen. ...
-
As a teacher of ethics for over 20 years now, I’ve always been interested in what sorts of actions students view as morally wrong. I ty...
-
Imagine a species that is so fecund that it spreads to every habitable corner of its ecosystem. Then imagine that same species as it voracio...
-
The Chinese currently have a population of 1.3 billion people. The U.S. has a population of 300 million. The average ecological footprint...
No comments:
Post a Comment